2011年1月24日星期一
Commented that the new U.S. light tanks may not be equipped with force (Figure) _ _ A Core Sina blog.
Category: International <a href="http://www.cachyeu.info/"> Help Desk Tracking Software </ a> suspected U.S. military's next-generation prototype M1A3 main battle tanks or technical <a href = "http: ./ / www.ajaxify.info/ "> Desk Help Software Tracking </ a> kind of car show exposure. .U.S. light tank chassis, the new structure of the rear similar to M1A2SEP. .<wbr> 2011 �� 1 17, a few fans in the United States by the U.S. military stations of a freight train hit a military photographs fan community, a suspected U.S. M1A3 main battle tank prototype next-generation car or technology show like .vehicle exposure, which may be declared king of the world's main battle tank the real king coming soon. .Currently, some U.S. observers believe that such kind of car may be ATAC advanced technology demonstration vehicle tank gun (AdvancedTank CannonSystem), the purpose of this prototype is to verify that the new generation 120 mm 140 mm tank gun or tank gun, and the use of millimeter wave .the fire control radar gun, tank-like vehicles that may be named as the "blow," (Thumper), allegedly carried out this kind of car is only the next generation of main battle tanks of the U.S. military some kind of one car, but he .The appearance is so that people feel very shocked, the new tank gun really impressive next-generation main battle tank the American people really lifted. .(Pei Shen) Zhuangao Xinhuanet (Xinhua military commentator Zheng Wenhao) Generally speaking, people experienced a binge, have a certain psychological low tide. .China's military lovers experiencing the excitement of last week, after the first flight the F -20, this week did not seem impressive number of new equipment news. .If you have to count it, U.S. military's new main battle tank'd exposure can count one. .According to some media reports, these photos are a few fans in the U.S. military shooting of a freight train station to the. .Some U.S. observers believe that the exposure of the main battle tank tank gun should be ATAC advanced technology demonstration vehicle (AdvancedTankCannonSystem), its purpose is to verify a new generation of 120 mm or 140 mm tank gun gun, and the use of the new millimeter-wave Fire Control Radar .on gun control. .But this gigantic tank-like vehicle, we can see the shadow of the United States the next generation of tanks it? .Shape from the prototype, we can at least see that: If the tank main gun of the caliber over 120 mm, even up to 140 mm, the volume of the tank's turret would be <a href = "http://www.sense-of-wonder .. info / "> wells fargo home equity loans </ a> produce what kind of impact. .Many users are on a huge turret prototype Zheliang left a deep impression. .Increase the volume of the turret, even taking into account the application of new materials, but also inevitably bring about the increase in weight. .Even if the tank's chassis running gear change, its size and weight of air transport is also a very big challenge. .But this time the U.S. military in the freight station photographed the new tank photo, you can not be explained by the various transport aircraft used to transport U.S. military active duty. .Therefore, I believe, although the tank looks "to force", but the U.S. military's future main battle tank is probably not like this. .Even the U.S. military future there is no "main battle tank," the concept is questionable. .In fact the U.S. Army had a huge "FCS" plan to have people not see the development of main battle tanks, the road was. .Although the FCS program was eventually cut the U.S. military, but for the U.S. main battle tank, the M1 series based on the basis of the current "upgrade", "weight" has become the consensus of the Army. .United States, "Army Times" has reported, based on the active upgraded M1A2 M1A3, clearly must fight the whole weight from 60 tons to the decline in transport costs should come down. .From this point of view, we see that the "giant" turret, never to enter the U.S. Army senior officials of his stuff, only a military enthusiasts and even computer games fantasy scenes. .140 mm tank gun, it is not a U.S. engaged. .But the final effect is being questioned. .In fact, against main battle tanks in addition to other, the various existing 120 mm and 125 mm tanks against ground targets and fortifications should be sufficient. .Tanks are in every country can boast of how strong frontal armor, but deliberately avoided completely the most deadly threat is not from the Zhimiao fire attack but from the top of the various air munitions. .In this sense, the main battle tank of the conventional development, seems to have come to an end. .From World War II, "tiger" type, "mouse" type tanks to "Stalin -3" and then to M1 "Abrams", and now see the new tank-like vehicles, heavy artillery of a main battle tank seems to have touched .to the head of the history of the ceiling. .Not play that game go on it! .In fact, the U.S. Army would like to play so the U.S. government would not give money to let it spoil. .U.S. Department of Defense is preparing to cut over the next 5 years $ 78,000,000,000, of which the main board to hit the Army, Marine Corps military services to work, the ground. .U.S. Army to cut 49,000 people, 20,000 Marines have to go people. .In the equipment, the loss of the two military services also relatively large. .U.S. Army's SLAMRAAM surface to air missiles, non-Zhimiao guns, used in FCS the next generation of missile launcher systems are to be abolished. .Everyone knows that the Navy reduce the construction of a destroyer, a small U.S. Air Force aircraft equipped with a few F-35, are enough to drink a pot of the Army. .Marines than "expeditionary combat vehicles" project is the tragic situation spike, the Army still get the point advantage. .That can be active M1 "Abrams" tanks, "Bradley" fighting vehicles, "Patrick Adams," the chariot of the new and modern upgrades. .Thus, it at least M1A3 we could see nothing. .Then the M1A3 after that, only God knows the. .<! - Body end ->.
订阅:
博文评论 (Atom)
没有评论:
发表评论